Join for FREE | Take the Tour Lost Password?
[x]

deviantART

 

STAMP: sparklepires by =Freakzter:iconFreakzter:

Categories deviantART Related > Deviant Stamps

©2009 =Freakzter
:iconfreakzter:

Artist's Comments

the typo is intentional. it will NOT be changed because i DO NOT CARE as much as you do.

too many comments! not enough time! i always wondered why ppl lock comments on their popular stamps and now i know :/
sorry ppl, but i cant keep up plus they are too distracting.

_____________________________________________

if you want to argue, just use the responses i have below as my reply ;) because i can no longer keep up with comments

The amount of energy it takes to create a stamp could prolly power an led light for a few seconds and that's it. Considering i'm a fast typer, it only takes me seconds to respond to messages. Thus, I am spending very little time and energy on debating this with you.

whether vampires are real or not is so irrelevant, you should be drawn and quartered just for mentioning it.

there is no book or record with the 'official rules of a vampire' because people have made the mistake of assuming that others have enough common logic to just know what the properties are and why they are important.

I personally don't care about vampires. However, I fucking HATE ignorance and stupidity. I would defend the very life of my enemy if his rival was being a dumbass. ONCE AGAIN, i DO NOT CARE ABOUT VAMPIRES. THAT IS NOT WHAT I AM SUPPORTING HERE.

vampires, like unicorns, and dragons, and all other mythical beasts are most definitely defined. Loosely, but DEFINED. For the LOGICAL reason that if they did not have species properties (just like non fictional species! or have you not learned that in school yet?), then we would have undead unicorns, blood sucking dragons, vegetarian zombies, and sparkling vampires.

without rules for fictional animals, people could create a hobgoblin and call it a unicorn. people with talent can work WITH rules and make them flow, resulting in something that will last for generations. people without talent have to break them and force things to work, resulting in loss of integrity. the comic world is all too aware of this. the horror culture is no different.

Meyers did not make mere edits. 30 nights made edits. Blade made edits. Underworld made edits. Meyers created a whole new species made of softcore and sparkles and slapped the name "vampire" on it.

I have no respect for someone who sucks so bad at creating good characters and plot, that she has no choice but to resort to destroying a generations old species in the name of "psuedoriginality." Being original and different, as history has shown, does NOT always equal "good."

First of all, it takes no talent to change some random trait on a species. Second of all, it DEFINATELY takes talent to take "the same idea" and still create a good story or movie out of it. THATS creativity. When you don't HAVE to change a species properties in order to make your idea work. Meyers is a disgrace to intelligent writers who are genuinely creative and have the CAPABILITY to leave history unchanged because they never run out of GOOD ideas.

The traditional vampire you are so prepared to diss has lasted for GENERATIONS. I can guarentee you the "sparklepire" of the late 2000s will not last for even a fraction as long.

I have seen alot of stupid things in my 24 years of living. The fact that I remain tolerant of about 95% of them means that when I do complain about something, there must be something seriously fucked up about it on a deep level that most people don't catch because they simply either don't have enough life experience or don't read enough history.

And why do people think that our brains are only capable of worrying about "far better things?" Am I the only person on this planet capable of caring of both the big and little things just as equally? Didn't the big problems start out SMALL??


and =bardicsidhe summed things up pretty nicely by saying:
If they aren't harmed by sunlight, they don't go into a coma-like sleep during the day and they don't have fangs at least some of the time, either don't call them vampires or else have a @#*%& good reason in your story why the rest of the world thinks they should even when they don't. Have some respect for all of the other authors and screenwriters who DEVELOPED this creature into something marketable and attractive to large audiences. Have some respect for your own abilities as an author to do justice to the legend of the monster, rather than just cabbage on to a popular genre.

Details

May 14
37.8 KB
37.8 KB
99×56

Statistics

Disabled
6,152 [who?]
24,259 (29 today)
0 (0 today)

Share

Link
Embed
Thumb

Site Map

©2009 deviantART. All rights reserved
About Us | Contact Us | Site Tour | Help & FAQ Advertise | Services Etiquette | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Copyright Policy